Conclusion
In conclusion of this review, and this course, I will refer back to our very first reading by Abid Haleem, Mohd Javaid, Mohd Asim Qadri, and Rajiv Suman (2022). They conclude that technology in the classroom may save the educator a lot of time and effort. They conclude that technology in the classroom will help students make decisions and prepare them for lifelong learning. They conclude that technology will allow students to study at their own pace in accordance with their learning style; and , they conclude that students can learn more efficiently and both the educator and learner can more easily track their progress.
I agree with all of these points and perhaps one of the tools presented on this website will help you do some of these things as well. Through the use of tools and frameworks such as Tony Bates ACTIONS model (Managing technology in education: Key frameworks and decisions 2025), the ISTE Teacher Ready Evaluation Tool (ISTE, 2023), SAMR, Universal Design for Learning (Universal Design for learning｜Cast), and numerous others, educators of today and tomorrow can continue to choose the right technology to utilize in their classrooms in a way that benefits themselves, their institutions and most importantly, the learner.
References
About. Alice. (n.d.). https://www.alice.org/about/
Bada, S. O. (2015). Constructivism learning theory: A paradigm for teaching and learning. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education, 5(6), 66–70. https://www.iosrjournals.org/iosr-jrme/papers/Vol-5%20Issue-6/Version-1/I05616670.pdf
Distance Learning Institute. (2025, December 12). Managing technology in education: Key frameworks and decisions. Distance Learning Institute. https://distancelearning.institute/educational-communication-technologies/managing-technology-in-education-frameworks-and-decisions/
Drew, C. (n.d.). Humanist theory in education. Helpful Professor. https://helpfulprofessor.com/humanist-theory-in-education/
Gibbly. (n.d.). Gibbly: AI lesson and quiz generators for teachers. https://www.gibbly.co/dashboard/upgrade
Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Qadri, M. A., & Suman, R. (2022). Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A Review. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 3, 275–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004
ISTE. (2023). Teacher Ready Edtech Product Evaluation Guide. International Society for Technology in Education.
Kumari, S. (2024). Humanism in education: Fostering student-centered learning through Maslow’s and Rogers’ theories. International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews, 5(7), 2447–2452. https://ijrpr.com/uploads/V5ISSUE7/IJRPR31533.pdf
Kurt, S. (2023, October 25). Cognitivism learning theory, strategies and examples. Educational Technology. https://educationaltechnology.net/cognitivism-learning-theory-strategies-and-examples/
Li, Y. (2025). A critical analysis of the advantages and limitations of the teaching methods under the constructivism theory. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Education Innovation and Philosophical Inquiries. https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/89/2025.22818
Mahaffey, C., Walden, A. C., & Ashlyn C. Walden. (2025). Choosing Classroom Technologies. In ACCESS (1st ed., Vol. 1, pp. 81–88). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003485476-7
NU Editorial Contributors. (2023, August 17). Behaviorism in education: What is behavioral learning theory? National University. https://www.nu.edu/blog/behaviorism-in-education/
Ontario. (n.d.). Gibbly. Source from Ontario. https://www.sourcefromontario.com/en/page/delegate/137406/gibbly
Sahin, M. (2012). Pros and cons of connectivism as a learning theory. International Journal of Physical and Social Sciences, 2(4), 437–454. http://www.ijmra.us
Scapin, D. L., & Bastien, J. M. C. (1997). Ergonomic criteria for evaluating the ergonomic quality of interactive systems. Behaviour & Information Technology, 16(4–5), 220–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/014492997119806
Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1). http://www.edtechpolicy.org/AAASGW/Session2/siemens_article.pdf
Universal Design for learning｜Cast. CAST. (n.d.). https://www.cast.org/what-we-do/universal-design-for-learning/
Wiske, S. (2004). Using Technology to Dig for Meaning. Educational Leadership, 62(1), 46–50.
Younet. (n.d.). https://younet.ai/
Younet. eCampusOntario. (2023, November 15).
https://community.ecampusontario.ca/sandbox/post/welcome-to-younet-community-of-practice-G9M22vfwUBi3dl7